Paranormalne Javy, Konspiracne Teorie atd.

To snáď nemôžeš myslieť vážne lucifer666x

Ja som pozrel asi tri časti. Mal som dosť, keď sa objavila obrazovka s nápisom Rain Man is the Devil.

Plus totálne prekrútili Jay-Zho slová, keď povedal že si mrmlal čísla ako RainMan si mrmle čísla. Tí kreténi, ktorí tieto videá spravili asi ani nevideli film s Dustinom Hoffmanom - Rain Man a dokážu vydolovať konšpiračnú teóriu aj na tému "kto mi osral spodky".

Pre takých odporúčam pozrieť si film 28 s Jim Carreym, nieje to síce výkvet Holywoodskej produkcie ale ukazuje že pokiaľ človek chce vidieť konšpiráciu a spojitosť medzi zdanlivo nespojiteľnými vecami, uvidí ju tam.

// pridané po 5 minútach od posledného príspevku

//aaah, tak vidím že vo štvrtom dieli je zábavné rozuzlenie, už aj film Rain Man je diabolský

na fyzike alebo na inom predmete ste mohli pocitak ako sa ocelovy most alebo kolajnice roztiahnu v lete oproti zime, a to niesu velke teplotne rozdiely, aj ked sa zahriala ( nemusi sa tavit, staci aj 500C aby mala ine vlastnosti, nemusi sa samovolne ohybat ako cin) tak pod tlakom vrchnych poschodi sa ohne,
a zo sporakovych platniciek sa budovy nerobia, navyse platnicku mas vodorovne a nosniky su verkialne, a pochybuje ze pri horeni sporaka mas na platnicke taku hmotnost aby si to mohol porovnavat s poschodiami na vyskovej budove

ale kludne mozes moje slova brat ako bludy, a zobrat si pravdu od niekoho ineho

"Melted" Steel

Claim: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

Read more: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... ade-center

Obyčajná oceľ stráca pri tepelnom zaťažení (už pri 300 °C) vlastnosti - hlavne tvrdosť a pevnosť (motory, turbíny ...). Žiarupevnosť sa zlepší po pridaní legúr: nikel, volfrám, chróm, molybdén, vanád. Nominálna pracovná teplota pre také ocele je od 300 °C do 550 °C.

Na stavbu byla použita vysoce kvalitní ocel, certifikovaná prestižní firmou Underwriters Laboratories (UL), která splňovala velmi náročné normy (např. ESTM E119, pro zachování pevnosti při působení tepla na ni, a další vlastnosti).

pochybujem ze pri takej velkej stavbe pouzili inu drahsiu

:D vysvetlenia od odbornikov a co si myslis ze USAcky vedci povedia ze si to odpalila sama vlada ? si vadny ? ako prvy sa uplcaju odbornici, nakolko tym kazdy veri, a vedia tam hodit nejake tie ich odborne terminy...

dalej vravis citujem "staci trosku pohladat relevantne zdroje a mat otvorenu mysel namiesto slepej viery v nieco co na prvy pohlad mozno dava zmysel. " a ty preco bezhlavo bez nejakeho toho uvazovania pocuvas to co ti povedia "odbornicy" alebo media ? sak to by sme boli ciste ofce bez nazoru...

:D vysvetlenia od odbornikov a co si myslis ze USAcky vedci povedia ze si to odpalila sama vlada ? si vadny ?

ako prvy sa uplcaju odbornici, nakolko tym kazdy veri, a vedia tam hodit nejake tie ich odborne terminy...

a ty preco bezhlavo bez nejakeho toho uvazovania pocuvas to co ti povedia "odbornicy" alebo media ?

sak to by sme boli ciste ofce bez nazoru...

zamyslite sa nad tým sedliackym rozumom

tu je chyba v tvojej logike aj v logike konspiratorov, sedliackym rozum ti nezarucuje ze sa dostanes k pravde, casto skor naopak

odomna posledna vec k tomu, al-kajda utocila casto bombovymi utokmi, preto nieje vylucene ze do budov umiestnili naloze alebo nieco ine,

navyse platnicku mas vodorovne a nosniky su verkialne